Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 10821003"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
United States Patent and Trademark Office 
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS 
P.O. Box 1450 

Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 
www.uspto.gov 



APPLICATION NO. 


FILING DATE 


FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 


ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 


CONFIRMATION NO. 


10/821,003 


04/08/2004 


Susanne Rathjen 


03/056 NUT CIP 2 


9302 



38263 7590 08/21/2007 

PROPAT, L.L.C. 

425-C SOUTH SHARON AMITY ROAD 
CHARLOTTE, NC 2821 1-2841 



EXAMINER 



CHAWLA, JYOTI 



ART UNIT 



1761 



PAPER NUMBER 



MAIL DATE 



DELIVERY MODE 



08/21/2007 PAPER 

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. 

The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. 



PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) 



Office Action Summary 


Application No. 

10/821,003 


Applicant(s) 

RATHJEN, SUSANNE 


Examiner 

Jyoti Chawla 


Art Unit 

1761 





The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address ~ 
Period for Reply 



A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 1 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS, 
WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION. 

- Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1 . 1 36(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed 
after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this commu nication. 

- If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 1 33). 
Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any 
earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). 

Status 

1)D Responsive to communication(s) filed on . 

2a)D This action is FINAL. 2b)K This action is non-final. 

3) D Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is 

closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213. 

Disposition of Claims 

4) Kl Claim(s) 1^24 is/are pending in the application. 

4a) Of the above claim(s) is/are withdrawn from consideration. 

5) D Claim(s) is/are allowed. 

6) D Claim(s) is/are rejected. 

7) D Claim(s) is/are objected to. 

8) S Claim(s) 1-24 are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. 

Application Papers 

9) D The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 

10) D The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) □ accepted or b)D objected to by the Examiner. 

Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1 .85(a). 
Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). 

1 1) D The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152. 

Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 

12) D Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 1 19(a)-(d) or (f). 
a)D All b)D Some * c)D None of: 

1 .□ Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 

2. D Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. . 

3. D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage 

application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). 
* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. 



Attach ment(s) 

1 ) □ Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 4) □ Interview Summary (PTO-41 3) 

2) □ Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948) Paper No(s)/Mail Date. . 

3) n Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449 or PTO/SB/08) 5 ) D Notice of Informal Patent Application (PTO-152) 

Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 6) □ Other: . 



U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
PTOL-326 (Rev. 7-05) 



Office Action Summary 



Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20070817 



Application/Control Number: 10/821,003 
Art Unit: 1761 



Page 2 



DETAILED ACTION 

Election/Restrictions 
Restriction to one of the following inventions is required under 35 U.S.C. 121: 
Group I, claim(s) 1-7 and 16-20; drawn to one sweetener composition and process of 
using the sweetener, classified in class 426, subclass 548 
Group II, claim(s) 8-15 and 21-24; drawn to a second sweetener composition and 
process of using the second sweetener, classified in class 426, subclass 548. 

Inventions of Group I and Group II are directed to related products (i.e., two distinct 
sweetener compositions) and processes of their use. The related inventions are distinct 
if the (1) the inventions as claimed are either not capable of use together or can have a 
materially different design, mode of operation, function, or effect; (2) the inventions do 
not overlap in scope, i.e., are mutually exclusive; and (3) the inventions as claimed are 
not obvious variants. See MPEP § 806.050). In the instant case, the inventions as 
claimed have a materially different design (compositions) as inventions of Group I 
requires specific amount of carbohydrate sweeteners and aspartame or sucralose as 
the high intensity sweetener in the finished composition, which is not required by the 
invention of Group II as recited. The invention of Group II, however, requires two high 
intensity sweeteners, which are acesulfame-K and neotame, which are not required in 
the composition as recited in claims of Group I. Thus the inventions address two 
different sweetener compositions. Furthermore, the inventions as claimed do not 
encompass overlapping subject matter and there is nothing of record to show them to 
be obvious variants. 

Because these inventions are independent or distinct for the reasons given above and 
there would be a serious burden on the examiner if restriction is not required because 
the inventions require a different field of search and/ or the inventions have acquired a 
separate status in the art in view of their different classification, restriction for 
examination purposes as indicated is proper. . 



Application/Control Number: 10/821,003 



Page 3 



Art Unit: 1761 

Applicant is advised that the reply to this requirement to be complete must 
include an election of the invention to be examined even though the requirement be 
traversed (37 CFR 1.143). 

Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the 
examiner should be directed to Jyoti Chawla whose telephone number is (571) 272- 
8212. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. 

If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's 
supervisor, Keith Hendricks can be reached on (571) 272-1401. The fax phone number 
for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 

Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the 
Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for 
published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. 
Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. 
For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should 
you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic 
Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a 
USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information 
system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 



Jyoti Chawla 
Examiner 
Art Unit 1761 




PRIMARY EXWflKSB